If you were asked whether which you prefer FRM vs CFA, your first question might be “What is an FRM?” This is because this designation is not as well-known as the title Certified Financial Analyst. A person who has the title of FRM works in the business of financial risk management, such as the president of a bank. There is a vast difference in the path to CFA vs FRM because of the strenuous exams one has to pass in order to be certified as a CFA. FRM is not really an essential qualification for a position that has a high salary, but CFA definitely is.

FRM vs CFA Training

You have to study and write exams in order to qualify for both of these certifications but the material you do study takes you in two different directions. FRM vs CFA also involves different lengths of time. It takes two years to take the two levels for FRM and three years for CFA. In most cases it takes longer than that to pass the three exams required for CFA certification because the exams are very difficult and the pass rates are extremely low.

There is nothing wrong with diversifying your career as a CFA and getting the FRM designation at a later date. In this way you can really bring intense management to your clients in the way in which you can handle and analyze their portfolio. In this way you would be CFA FRM or if you take the risk management program first you would be FRM CFA.

FRM vs CFA Jobs

The work that you do with each of these certifications is what sets them apart most of all. There is a great deal of competition for FRM but that is not the case for CFA. The increased chance you have of obtaining a job after graduation may influence your decision of CFA or FRM. However, you do have to look at the length of time it will take you to reach the end point of this and this might cause you to reconsider your decision of FRM or CFA.

Get the information you need for FRM vs CPA at to make it easier for you to decide.


See how helpful cfa level 1 sample questions can be when you visit